cannon-chambers-logo
Menu

HYMAN, PENSFOLD AND GOODFELLOW V HMRC [2021]

In this appeal, Cannon Chambers represented the taxpayers in their appeal to the Upper Tribunal which argued that their property purchases should have been classified as of mixed residential and non-residential land and so should have been liable to the lower rates of SDLT in Table B.’

We relied on HMRC’s published practice since 2003 that was only changed in 2019 as representing the correct legal interpretation of “residential property” but in the appeal, HMRC said that their practice had been a mistake and the Upper Tribunal agreed with them.

Read the full decision here

Click here to view our latest notable cases.

You might also be interested in...

SIMON AND JOANNE HOLDING V HMRC TC/2020/02201

In this appeal, Cannon Chambers represented the taxpayers in their appeal to the Upper Tribunal which argued that their property purchases should have been classified as of mixed residential and non-residential land and so should have been liable to the lower rates of SDLT in Table B.’ We relied on…

Mr & Mrs Michael v HMRC TC/2022/12710

In this appeal, Cannon Chambers represented the taxpayers in their appeal to the Upper Tribunal which argued that their property purchases should have been classified as of mixed residential and non-residential land and so should have been liable to the lower rates of SDLT in Table B.’ We relied on…

Contact Us

Fill out the form and we will be in touch to discuss how we can help. You can also WhatsApp or call us.

Contact Us