cannon-chambers-logo
Menu

SIMON AND JOANNE HOLDING V HMRC TC/2020/02201

This was a decision about whether all the land sold with a country house extending to 40.6 acres formed part of the grounds of the dwelling so that the taxpayers’ purchase of the property was wholly residential instead of mixed-use. Patrick Cannon represented the taxpayers in this in-person hearing in Manchester.

After a careful review of the facts and the witness evidence about the property given in person by Mr Holding, the FTT found that all of the land, including a field that was used all year round for agricultural purposes and which was not visible from the dwelling, did provide amenity and benefit to the dwelling and as such, performed a function in relation to the dwelling as a dwelling. Accordingly, the SDLT due was £603,750 instead of the £219,500 that would have been due if a part of the land was not the grounds of the dwelling.

You can read the full decision here.

You might also be interested in...

Mr & Mrs Michael v HMRC TC/2022/12710

This was a decision about whether all the land sold with a country house extending to 40.6 acres formed part of the grounds of the dwelling so that the taxpayers’ purchase of the property was wholly residential instead of mixed-use. Patrick Cannon represented the taxpayers in this in-person hearing in…

HARJONO & SANTOSO V HMRC TC/2023/00910

This was a decision about whether all the land sold with a country house extending to 40.6 acres formed part of the grounds of the dwelling so that the taxpayers’ purchase of the property was wholly residential instead of mixed-use. Patrick Cannon represented the taxpayers in this in-person hearing in…

Contact Us

Fill out the form and we will be in touch to discuss how we can help. You can also WhatsApp or call us.

Contact Us