cannon-chambers-logo
Menu

SIMON AND JOANNE HOLDING V HMRC TC/2020/02201

This was a decision about whether all the land sold with a country house extending to 40.6 acres formed part of the grounds of the dwelling so that the taxpayers’ purchase of the property was wholly residential instead of mixed-use. Patrick Cannon represented the taxpayers in this in-person hearing in Manchester.

After a careful review of the facts and the witness evidence about the property given in person by Mr Holding, the FTT found that all of the land, including a field that was used all year round for agricultural purposes and which was not visible from the dwelling, did provide amenity and benefit to the dwelling and as such, performed a function in relation to the dwelling as a dwelling. Accordingly, the SDLT due was £603,750 instead of the £219,500 that would have been due if a part of the land was not the grounds of the dwelling.

You can read the full decision here.

You might also be interested in...

SUTERWALLA V HMRC [2024] UKUT 00188 (TCC)

This was HMRC's unsuccessful appeal to the Upper Tribunal against the FTT's decision that a paddock was not part of the grounds of a dwelling house for SDLT mixed-use purposes. In relation to HMRC's challenge, the UT said: "41. Mr Cannon submitted that HMRC’s challenges in this ground were ‘island...

DAVIS and GUILBERT V HMRC

This was a successful appeal by the taxpayers involving an uninhabitable dwelling they had purchased in London SW3 in 2020. They said that the dwelling was uninhabitable because of several defects which rendered the property potentially dangerous but HMRC did not accept that the property was uninhabitable. The Tribunal carefully reviewed...

Contact Us

Fill out the form and we will be in touch to discuss how we can help. You can also WhatsApp or call us.

Contact Us