cannon-chambers-logo
Menu

Mr & Mrs Michael v HMRC TC/2022/12710

Mr & Mrs Michael v HMRC TC/2022/12710  was an appeal involving a claim by the taxpayers that the property they had purchased was of mixed residential and non-residential land for stamp duty purposes due to the presence of a woodland of 3.5 acres at the back of their dwelling and its garden of half an acre.
The FTT did not accept the taxpayers’ evidence that the woodland did not provide any privacy or security for the half-acre garden and dwelling and so was not a part of the grounds of the dwelling and it applied mechanistically the nine principles derived from various SDLT cases on “grounds” as articulated by Judge Baldwin in Faiers v HMRC [2023] UKFTT 212 (TC) at [44] to decide that the entire property was residential and so subject to the rates of tax in Table A.
Mr & Mrs Michael Transfer Plan
michael transfer plan
To read the full decision, click here.

You might also be interested in...

SUTERWALLA V HMRC [2024] UKUT 00188 (TCC)

This was HMRC's unsuccessful appeal to the Upper Tribunal against the FTT's decision that a paddock was not part of the grounds of a dwelling house for SDLT mixed-use purposes. In relation to HMRC's challenge, the UT said: "41. Mr Cannon submitted that HMRC’s challenges in this ground were ‘island...

DAVIS and GUILBERT V HMRC

This was a successful appeal by the taxpayers involving an uninhabitable dwelling they had purchased in London SW3 in 2020. They said that the dwelling was uninhabitable because of several defects which rendered the property potentially dangerous but HMRC did not accept that the property was uninhabitable. The Tribunal carefully reviewed...

Contact Us

Fill out the form and we will be in touch to discuss how we can help. You can also WhatsApp or call us.

Contact Us