cannon-chambers-logo
Menu

SIMON AND JOANNE HOLDING V HMRC TC/2020/02201

This was a decision about whether all the land sold with a country house extending to 40.6 acres formed part of the grounds of the dwelling so that the taxpayers’ purchase of the property was wholly residential instead of mixed-use. Patrick Cannon represented the taxpayers in this in-person hearing in Manchester.

After a careful review of the facts and the witness evidence about the property given in person by Mr Holding, the FTT found that all of the land, including a field that was used all year round for agricultural purposes and which was not visible from the dwelling, did provide amenity and benefit to the dwelling and as such, performed a function in relation to the dwelling as a dwelling. Accordingly, the SDLT due was £603,750 instead of the £219,500 that would have been due if a part of the land was not the grounds of the dwelling.

You can read the full decision here.

You might also be interested in...

CHARLIE JOHNSON V HMRC TC/2024/00254

This was a successful appeal by the taxpayer about whether multiple dwellings relief ("MDR") from SDLT applied to his purchase of a residential property with a self-contained annex. In a carefully structured and considered decision the FTT reviewed the evidence thoroughly and held that HMRC's objections concerning the interconnecting doors and shared...

ANDREI TRETYAKOV V HMRC TC/2023/16164

This decision concerned an SDLT mixed-use appeal, i.e., whether the property in question was of mixed residential and non-residential use. The additional SDLT if the property was wholly residential was £484,250. It might be thought that genuine commercial use of a part of a building where the other parts were...

Contact Us

Fill out the form and we will be in touch to discuss how we can help. You can also WhatsApp or call us.

Contact Us