cannon-chambers-logo
Menu

SIMON AND JOANNE HOLDING V HMRC TC/2020/02201

This was a decision about whether all the land sold with a country house extending to 40.6 acres formed part of the grounds of the dwelling so that the taxpayers’ purchase of the property was wholly residential instead of mixed-use. Patrick Cannon represented the taxpayers in this in-person hearing in Manchester.

After a careful review of the facts and the witness evidence about the property given in person by Mr Holding, the FTT found that all of the land, including a field that was used all year round for agricultural purposes and which was not visible from the dwelling, did provide amenity and benefit to the dwelling and as such, performed a function in relation to the dwelling as a dwelling. Accordingly, the SDLT due was £603,750 instead of the £219,500 that would have been due if a part of the land was not the grounds of the dwelling.

You can read the full decision here.

You might also be interested in...

THE WOOL HOUSE LIMITED V HMRC TC/2022/11576 and 2023/00414

In this appeal to the FTT, HMRC sought recovery of an SDLT refund paid to the taxpayer and received by it around the same time as the issue of the closure notice refusing the claim and asking for the refund to be repaid with interest. The core question for the...

ALEXANDER CLARK AND REBECCA CLARK V HMRC TC/2023/00127

In this appeal about whether there were two separate dwellings at the property for the purpose of Multiple Dwellings Relief, the First-tier Tax Tribunal said that insufficient degrees of separation and privacy and security together with the status of the common utilities meant that the two dwellings could not each be...

Contact Us

Fill out the form and we will be in touch to discuss how we can help. You can also WhatsApp or call us.

Contact Us