cannon-chambers-logo
Menu

MUDAN V HMRC TC/2022/02868

This decision of the First Tier Tax Tribunal concerned whether a house that was unsafe to occupy at the effective date of the transaction was nevertheless “suitable for use as a single dwelling” and is notable for distinguishing and not following the approach in Bewley.

Procedurally, the case was also notable amongst First Tier Tribunal tax decisions for HMRC’s extraordinary but unsuccessful attempt to ambush the taxpayer at the start of the hearing by applying to exclude the taxpayers’ various survey reports on the state and condition of the dwelling.

HMRC had not only been provided with these reports before the issue of their closure notice of June 2021 but had discussed and relied on them in the closure notice. Despite this, HMRC wanted the reports excluded on the morning of the hearing on the basis that these were “an attempt to introduce expert evidence by the backdoor”.

You can read the full decision here

You might also be interested in...

SUTERWALLA V HMRC [2024] UKUT 00188 (TCC)

This was HMRC's unsuccessful appeal to the Upper Tribunal against the FTT's decision that a paddock was not part of the grounds of a dwelling house for SDLT mixed-use purposes. In relation to HMRC's challenge, the UT said: "41. Mr Cannon submitted that HMRC’s challenges in this ground were ‘island...

DAVIS and GUILBERT V HMRC

This was a successful appeal by the taxpayers involving an uninhabitable dwelling they had purchased in London SW3 in 2020. They said that the dwelling was uninhabitable because of several defects which rendered the property potentially dangerous but HMRC did not accept that the property was uninhabitable. The Tribunal carefully reviewed...

Contact Us

Fill out the form and we will be in touch to discuss how we can help. You can also WhatsApp or call us.

Contact Us