cannon-chambers-logo
Menu

Let's discuss how we can help you.

For tax advice and representation with some of the UK’s leading specialist tax advisers please contact Cannon Chambers

Get in touch

MEHDI MOAREF AND ARMAGHAN MOZHDEH V HMRC

Patrick Cannon represented the taxpayers in this appeal where the tax tribunal decided that the refund of the 3% higher rates on the sale of a main residence following the acquisition of the replacement was not available when the taxpayers had purchased two side-by side apartments a few weeks apart with the intention of amalgamating them to form one apartment as their replacement main residence prior to the sale of their old main residence.

The decision has some helpful analysis of how to interpret the provisions in Schedule 4ZA FA 2003.

Read the full decision here.

Click here to view our latest notable cases.

You might also be interested in...

BURLEY V HMRC [2025] UKFTT 989 (TC)

This appeal concerned the assignment by the taxpayer of his rights to the income from two film trading partnerships to an LLP of which he and his company were members. The company became entitled to the income which arose from the assignments, after the loan obligations taken out by the taxpayer...

L-L-O CONTRACTING LIMITED AND OTHERS V HMRC [2025] UKUT 00127 (TCC)

This was the hearing before the Upper Tribunal of the appellants' claims for overpayment relief from SDLT under paragraph 34 Schedule 10 FA 2003 in circumstances where the appellants had failed to claim Multiple Dwellings Relief ("MDR") in their return or in an amendment to their return, within 12 months...
Contact Us