cannon-chambers-logo
Menu

KOZLOWSKI v HMRC TC/2023/00327

This was an SDLT mixed-use claim from a respected FTT judge who importantly decided that (1) a property must fall within section 116(1) as residential before Schedule 4ZA can apply to it; (2) genuine commercial use of land that would otherwise be garden or grounds of a dwelling takes it out of section 116(1)(b) so that it is not residential; and (3) section 116(1)(c) relates to rights attaching to the property acquired which are exercisable over third party land and not the purchased land itself. HMRC had firmly resisted all three points but the Judge agreed with Patrick Cannon‘s submissions on them.

The Judge did, however, agree with HMRC that the property is to be judged as residential or not at the actual time of completion and not by reference to other events on the day of completion, in this case, the grant of a lease over a garage immediately after completion.

You can read the full decision here.

You might also be interested in...

L-L-O CONTRACTING LIMITED AND OTHERS V HMRC [2025] UKUT 00127 (TCC)

This was the hearing before the Upper Tribunal of the appellants' claims for overpayment relief from SDLT under paragraph 34 Schedule 10 FA 2003 in circumstances where the appellants had failed to claim Multiple Dwellings Relief ("MDR") in their return or in an amendment to their return, within 12 months...

CHARLIE JOHNSON V HMRC TC/2024/00254

This was a successful appeal by the taxpayer about whether multiple dwellings relief ("MDR") from SDLT applied to his purchase of a residential property with a self-contained annex. In a carefully structured and considered decision the FTT reviewed the evidence thoroughly and held that HMRC's objections concerning the interconnecting doors and shared...

Contact Us

Fill out the form and we will be in touch to discuss how we can help. You can also WhatsApp or call us.

Contact Us