cannon-chambers-logo
Menu

KOZLOWSKI v HMRC TC/2023/00327

This was an SDLT mixed-use claim from a respected FTT judge who importantly decided that (1) a property must fall within section 116(1) as residential before Schedule 4ZA can apply to it; (2) genuine commercial use of land that would otherwise be garden or grounds of a dwelling takes it out of section 116(1)(b) so that it is not residential; and (3) section 116(1)(c) relates to rights attaching to the property acquired which are exercisable over third party land and not the purchased land itself. HMRC had firmly resisted all three points but the Judge agreed with Patrick Cannon‘s submissions on them.

The Judge did, however, agree with HMRC that the property is to be judged as residential or not at the actual time of completion and not by reference to other events on the day of completion, in this case, the grant of a lease over a garage immediately after completion.

You can read the full decision here.

You might also be interested in...

THE WOOL HOUSE LIMITED V HMRC TC/2022/11576 and 2023/00414

In this appeal to the FTT, HMRC sought recovery of an SDLT refund paid to the taxpayer and received by it around the same time as the issue of the closure notice refusing the claim and asking for the refund to be repaid with interest. The core question for the...

ALEXANDER CLARK AND REBECCA CLARK V HMRC TC/2023/00127

In this appeal about whether there were two separate dwellings at the property for the purpose of Multiple Dwellings Relief, the First-tier Tax Tribunal said that insufficient degrees of separation and privacy and security together with the status of the common utilities meant that the two dwellings could not each be...

Contact Us

Fill out the form and we will be in touch to discuss how we can help. You can also WhatsApp or call us.

Contact Us