cannon-chambers-logo
Menu

HYMAN, PENSFOLD AND GOODFELLOW V HMRC [2021]

In this appeal, Cannon Chambers represented the taxpayers in their appeal to the Upper Tribunal which argued that their property purchases should have been classified as of mixed residential and non-residential land and so should have been liable to the lower rates of SDLT in Table B.’

We relied on HMRC’s published practice since 2003 that was only changed in 2019 as representing the correct legal interpretation of “residential property” but in the appeal, HMRC said that their practice had been a mistake and the Upper Tribunal agreed with them.

Read the full decision here

Click here to view our latest notable cases.

You might also be interested in...

THE WOOL HOUSE LIMITED V HMRC TC/2022/11576 and 2023/00414

In this appeal to the FTT, HMRC sought recovery of an SDLT refund paid to the taxpayer and received by it around the same time as the issue of the closure notice refusing the claim and asking for the refund to be repaid with interest. The core question for the...

ALEXANDER CLARK AND REBECCA CLARK V HMRC TC/2023/00127

In this appeal about whether there were two separate dwellings at the property for the purpose of Multiple Dwellings Relief, the First-tier Tax Tribunal said that insufficient degrees of separation and privacy and security together with the status of the common utilities meant that the two dwellings could not each be...

Contact Us

Fill out the form and we will be in touch to discuss how we can help. You can also WhatsApp or call us.

Contact Us