cannon-chambers-logo
Menu

James and Charlotte Averdieck V HMRC TC/2022/02324

This is the first appeal about mixed-use residential and non-residential property for SDLT in the wake of the Court of Appeal’s decision on the meaning of “grounds of a dwelling” in Hyman and Goodfellow v HMRC [2022] EWCA Civ 185. Patrick Cannon represented the taxpayers who sought to establish that part of a busy public road within the boundary of their residential property served no functional purpose for the property and so should not be regarded as the grounds of the dwelling.

You can read the full decision here

You might also be interested in...

SUTERWALLA V HMRC [2024] UKUT 00188 (TCC)

This was HMRC's unsuccessful appeal to the Upper Tribunal against the FTT's decision that a paddock was not part of the grounds of a dwelling house for SDLT mixed-use purposes. In relation to HMRC's challenge, the UT said: "41. Mr Cannon submitted that HMRC’s challenges in this ground were ‘island...

DAVIS and GUILBERT V HMRC

This was a successful appeal by the taxpayers involving an uninhabitable dwelling they had purchased in London SW3 in 2020. They said that the dwelling was uninhabitable because of several defects which rendered the property potentially dangerous but HMRC did not accept that the property was uninhabitable. The Tribunal carefully reviewed...

Contact Us

Fill out the form and we will be in touch to discuss how we can help. You can also WhatsApp or call us.

Contact Us